| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1201. Stain Alliance officially splits - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
stupid "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.04.01 10:51:00
|
1202. [IRON] Announcment - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
i think ill kill myself "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.04.01 10:46:00
|
1203. [Ascendant Frontier] Official Press Release regarding the North - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
hey, i get it. its april the first but that is not an excuse for bad joke! "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.04.01 10:45:00
|
1204. [ATUK] Operation Sign Out - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: JimmySav ATUK lawyers declared victory in EVE for ATUK Ahahaha, aprilfools.. "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.04.01 10:43:00
|
1205. Carriers and Jump Drive abuse - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Amarraion im not gonna say much i jus wana c wat other ppl think plus i suck at this i think that its pty lame that a carrier can jump passed blockades and carry a nice amound of cargo at a extreem low cost its stupid that...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.30 17:32:00
|
1206. (for the devs) Kali, Trinity, DirectX10.... and Vista. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
yea, might aswell start from scratch and go for OpenGL. :P "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.30 16:53:00
|
1207. (for the devs) Kali, Trinity, DirectX10.... and Vista. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
yea, might aswell start from scratch and go for OpenGL. :P "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.30 16:53:00
|
1208. [Auction] Tremor L BPO - in Sell Orders [original thread]
that was fast tbh "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.30 11:39:00
|
1209. OMFG STFU with this Yoda talk!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Admiral IceBlock on 30/03/2006 11:35:59 nah go feck yourself :P "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.30 11:36:00
|
1210. (for the devs) Kali, Trinity, DirectX10.... and Vista. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tonkin then there be combatability issues when other types of clients try to comunicate wont work, lagg will be emense, im happy to go direct 10, but only 1/5 of eve could or less. graphics does not have anything to do wi...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.30 11:30:00
|
1211. [ATUK] Official Announcement - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Trepkos APRIL FOOLS? its not even first of april.. i dont think the atuk leadersship are that stupid? "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.30 05:53:00
|
1212. Territorial Alliance Map - Latest Update 07.07.2005 - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
people are soo stupid these days.. "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.30 05:52:00
|
1213. Faction loot ballance please - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
this is not balance your asking for. if you want to balance loot, make domination loot for example better then t1. "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.30 05:46:00
|
1214. Corp thieving is nothing done by ccp if it happens ? if so, why not? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
its a part of the game, only thing that is annoying is, a) an alt can do it. b) no audit log for corp hangars making it diffiuclt to point the finger. "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.29 20:06:00
|
1215. Blasterthron breakdown, ship vs ship, now and after possible - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
tbh to make a megathron be able to fitt tackling, tank and damage is a bit selfish. it should not be able to perform all three without sacrifice. "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.29 19:18:00
|
1216. Battles lasting still to short, - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
i dont think comparing times on 1vs1 battles is a good idea! the little the 25% helped got countered by t2 ammo... "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.29 14:47:00
|
1217. No log off warp or dissapearing in POS controlled systems - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
i suggest it as a pos module in the eve magazine compo. anyway, if you are not ready to take the risk and venture into enemy sovereignty systems you should maybe just turn around. with a system like this most people are forced to take the remote ...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.29 09:16:00
|
1218. How is going war against Red Aliance? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Uggster Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Originally by: Hast Originally by: Well wicked Originally by: Hast Originally by: Admiral IceBlock yea, we are like, totally mining .. I hel...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.28 21:31:00
|
1219. EW - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
well imo ecm should be reduced in strength -20% and make it so for each ecm you fitt you get +5% bonus to all their strength, meaning that only a dediciated jammer would actully be good at it. to get back at current level a person has to use 4 me...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.28 21:14:00
|
1220. Blasterthron breakdown, ship vs ship, now and after possible - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Slink Grinsdikild Originally by: Admiral IceBlock well a 10% falloff bonus instead of tracking bonus on megathron, reduction in cap usage and a 25% boost to tracking overall will help. bigger falloff then the sooner ...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.03.28 20:01:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |